Xbox One Will Be Region-Locked

Speaking to Digital Trends, a representative of Microsoft has confirmed that the Xbox One will be region-locked, surprising exactly nobody:

“Similar to the movie and music industry, games must meet country-specific regulatory guidelines before they are cleared for sale,” A rep from Microsoft confirmed to Digital Trends. “We will continue to work with our partners to follow these guidelines with Xbox One.”

The fact that this not-news is news is what’s interesting about this comment. Did anybody really think that after announcing its plans to control the used game market, in addition to mandatory Internet connections and Kinect sensor functionality, that Microsoft would let you play a new Japanese game without buying a Japanese system?

For most North American users, this won’t be a huge issue, as if history is any indication, there won’t be many foreign-developed games worth importing for the next Xbox. The article does point out that not region-locking a system may allow South American gamers to get their content easier, but due to legal issues, it’s probably better if something like this stays region-locked.

Xbox One: all or nothing?

microsoft-xbox-one-4842_610x407

CVG:

Microsoft unveiled the Xbox One at a press reveal event in Redmond yesterday to a mixed critical reaction, their tentative first step into the eighth console generation and a surprisingly loaded portent of how they plan to establish themselves in today’s economic current. The console entitles its user to a variety of simultaneous activities such that he can play a game while watching live television, throwing on a movie, or chatting with friends on Skype, all processes that can be controlled through voice command. Much of the press release focused on the One’s intended goal of supplanting all entertainment-related functions, with more specific games coverage likely being reserved for an event that generates more gamer hype (read: E3). Microsoft’s desired first impression based on the positioning of their product is clear: this is a machine designed for the majority of their consumer base, a set of casual gamers who will idle in front of any given AAA release until they get a video call or Monday Night Football rolls around.

The company has approached this one-black-box-fits-all attitude carelessly, implementing policies that will alienate devoted gamers and limit appeal to less informed audiences. The former didn’t necessarily stop the Wii, which was subject to dwindling third-party support and loss of interest from many longtime Nintendo fans but still claimed victory in every notable market. However, Microsoft is not enjoying the same reputation that Nintendo did when they stepped into the seventh generation – gamers are a wary lot now, and one might look to the currently dismal performance of the Wii U as a cautionary tale about willingly displacing one demographic to accommodate another. A glance at any given forum or comment thread suggests widespread dissatisfaction with certain elements of the One, such as Microsoft’s draconian DRM enforcement. Here is a system that claims to be a video gamer’s new best friend, and yet it won’t even let you loan your games to your real friends without forcing them to pay a console licensing fee? (This is, in diplomatic parlance, “a potential scenario.”) A required Internet connection once every 24 hours? No backwards compatibility? No importing your old downloaded games? The latter two are particularly galling because they constitute a transparent bid at stifling the obsolescence of the Xbox 360, but the devaluation of gaming technology is inevitable, especially when it’s so poorly constructed. If Microsoft expects gamers to bounce back and forth between their uber-machine and their old RROD factory just to have full access to all of their titles, then they’d better continue to furnish free maintenance for their old systems, which seems like an unwieldy expenditure for a consumer landscape that they project to be inundated with these wonderful Ones. “Fundamental architecture differences” my ass.

To address the system’s potential difficulty with reaching a casual audience, we can return to the Nintendo parallel. Much of the Wii’s success came from its celebration of family gaming and the shared living space, prioritizing software that was accessible and fun for players of all ages and skill levels. There were some fluffy features like the Weather Channel that granted it more flexibility than a dedicated gaming machine, but the intent behind the platform was always clear. Far less so with the Xbox One, which is in the precarious position of acting as a unifier of common entertainment services where there hasn’t yet been a proven need for one. Anyone with the means or desire to buy an One likely has all of the gadgetry they need to perform each of its vaunted tasks – a laptop, smart phone, and their previous-generation game console for television and movies if they don’t already own a cable box, or a Roku, or the million other similar peripherals. There is something wrongheaded AND disturbingly cynical about Microsoft’s assumption that, if given the chance, people will toss to the side all of these other electronic devices for the chance to sink into the couch and fulfill all of their digital needs through one system alone. At a less intimidating cost, the One may be able to acquit itself at least partially, but this seems unlikely given that a) the processing power is reportedly “eight times greater” than that of the Xbox 360, b) Microsoft claims that there will be over 300,000 servers to host the console’s need for, at least, that mandatory once-a-day connection, and c) a low price point for this system would probably force Microsoft to sell the console at a loss, which is a huge risk in this market. This is a multi-billion dollar industry operating in a culture of excess, where “doing less” has never been the answer the public is looking for even as it struggles to make ends meet.

With all this said, the question of the Xbox One’s library hangs in the balance, and the titles announced at this event are more or less what you’d expect from a Microsoft press conference. Lots of emphasis on their sports content, a Forza title, a new IP from Remedy and, naturally, another installment in the Call of Duty franchise. Quantum Break might be interesting, but everything else we’re seeing here looks like so much of the risk-averse chaff that gamers are growing increasingly dissatisfied with. If these games are your thing, more power to you, but  a gradually more conservative collection of titles, combined with roundly derided copy protection measures and a lot of redundant functionality, all align to make Microsoft’s next move feel a lot less important to watch than it was seven years ago. To me, this reveal reads as the scared baby steps of a company struggling to assert itself for a fractured set of demographics. (You can bet Sony’s keeping an eye on them, though, what with that 9% stock increase after the conference.)

Drew Byrd-Smith – drewbyrd.blogspot.com

Xbox One Clarifications Add More Confusion

Does the Xbox One always have to be online? According to Microsoft, no. However, it does require an Internet connection.

What does that mean? The Verge seeks to clarify:

The statement, while accurate, isn’t forthcoming with the information that gamers want to know. How long can I play offline, and is the connection required for single-player games? Kotaku attempted to clarify in a question to Microsoft’s Phil Harrison, asking if you’d need to connect as regularly as once per hour or over a period of weeks. “I believe it’s 24 hours,” said Harrison, before confirming you’d have to connect online once every day. However, Microsoft spokespeople later dismissed the exact timing. “There have been reports of a specific time period — those were discussions of potential scenarios, but we have not confirmed any details today, nor will we be,” Microsoft said in a statement to Polygon.

Basically, Microsoft hasn’t worked out the specifics of its new hardware, and as such, probably shouldn’t have said anything in order to avoid confusion. Also, what happens if we don’t connect every 24 hours? Does the system stop functioning? Do my saves roll back? Does the cotton candy machine stop working?

Further exacerbating the issue is the controversy surrounding game ownership and licenses.

The confusion doesn’t end there. A Wired report on the controversial online requirement introduced the notion of a fee for second-hand games, noting that a disc could be used with a second account, but that the owner of the new account would need to pay a fee and install the game from the disc. The result would mean the new account then owns the game, after the fee is paid, and can play without the disc. Microsoft was quick to note, once again, that this is a “potential scenario.” In a blog post from Larry Hryb, Xbox Live’s Major Nelson, the company attempts to clarify the confusion. “We have only confirmed that we designed Xbox One to enable our customers to trade in and resell games at retail,” says Hryb.

While PC gamers are used to buying a Steam license for a game and downloading it for use on their own account, asking console gamers to pony up the same fee when they have a physical copy of the game in front of them is a bit odd. And how will the system know that the game has been installed under another account? Unique serial numbers identifiers contained in the code of each copy of a game would be my guess, and the system will register that code under that account when connected online.

This is all guesswork at this point, as no real details are known. Not just by the press, but apparently by Microsoft as well. While I would like to say this reveal was handled poorly, I worked at retail during the N-Gage launch, so I can’t really complain.

Next Xbox to use online DRM to block used games?

Report: Next Xbox will use persistent ’Net connection to block used games | Ars Technica:

A new report from insider sources suggests that Microsoft’s next video game console will require a persistent Internet connection to lock out second-hand games from being played on the system.

Edge is citing “sources with first-hand experience of Microsoft’s next generation console” saying that games for the system will be available via download or as Blu-ray discs with a capacity of up to 50GB. The disc-based games will reportedly all ship with an activation code tying the game to a single user account, making the disc essentially worthless on the second-hand market.

No more trading games in at GameStop or lending to your friends if this is true. That’s pretty stupid, but given the way DRM has been moving in recent years on the PC, not completely out of left-field. I’m fine either way, thanks to Valve’s Steam Summer/Holiday sales and a Dell XPS desktop that should last me a solid 4 years or so if I update the graphics card in a year or two and don’t mind running less than max-quality graphics.

(Via @ajyasgar)